melanogaster (22, 23), we found that the effects of BGS can account for only part of the observed relation between ?_{S} and K _{I projected an average energy off choice towards certainly selected mutations, while the ratio of the latest mutations which might be advantageous, both for NS and UTR websites. Another facet of our very own means is that it provides gene conversion process on SSW therefore the BGS habits, which has a primary influence on this new parameter prices. Just like the we unearthed that the outcomes utilizing the D. melanogaster–D. yakuba research had best analytical qualities than those with the D. melanogaster origin, most likely while they offered more particular prices of rates of transformative progression, i desire interest for the former. From now on, we are going to relate to the two datasets given that mel-yak and you will mel, correspondingly.}

_{Empirical Abilities}

_{We first asked whether there was a relation between ?S and KA for autosomal genes located in regions with normal rates of crossing over, using data on all available genes (Materials and Methods, Primary Data Analyses); this is displayed in Fig. 1 and SI Appendix, Fig. S1, for mel-yak and mel, respectively. The Spearman rank correlations for the two datasets were small but significantly negative: mel-yak ? = ?0.082, P < 0.001; mel ? = ?0.077, P < 0.001). After correcting for the covariates described in Materials and Methods (SI Appendix, Table S1), the relations were still significant and negative (? = ?0.129, P < 10 ?16 for mel-yak; ? = –0.130, P < 10 ?16 for mel), with a multiple regression coefficient of –0.052 for mel-yak, and ?0.195 for mel. In contrast, the rank partial correlations between ?A and KA were positive, with ? = 0.412, P < 10 ?16 in mel-yak and ? = 0.428 in mel, as has previously been found (e.g., ref. 16). This result implies that the level of selective constraint on a coding sequence is negatively correlated with its KA value, consistent with the result from the DFE-? analyses described next.}

## An excellent, to make certain that SSW outcomes must be invoked

The plot of synonymous diversity (?_{S}) for genes in a Rwandan population of D. melanogaster against their nonsynonymous divergence from D. yakuba (K_{A}); ? is the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The green line is the least-squares linear regression (the dashed lines are its 95% CIs).

To examine the potential contributions of BGS and SSWs to the pattern for ?_{S}, we applied DFE-? (24) to each of 50 bins https://datingranking.net/escort-directory/hillsboro/ of K_{A} values, assuming gamma distributions of the selection coefficients for deleterious mutations within bins, as described in Materials and Methods, Primary Data Analyses (Table 1 and SI Appendix, Tables S2 and S3). The Spearman rank correlations for the mel-yak comparison across bins for ?_{S} versus ?_{a} and ?_{S} versus ?_{na} were –0.681 (P = 5 ? 10 ?8 ) and –0.727 (P = 2.26 ? 10 ?9 ). Here, ?_{a} is the ratio of the rate of substitution of positively selected NS mutations to the rate of substitution of synonymous mutations as measured by the synonymous site divergence K_{S} (25); ?_{na} is the corresponding ratio for substitutions of neutral or slightly deleterious NS mutations (26) and is an inverse measure of the level of selective constraint on the protein sequence. For mel, the rank correlations were ?0.829 (P < 10 ?13 ) and ?0.845 (P < 10 ?13 ), respectively. However, because both ?_{a} and ?_{na} for NS sites increase across bins of K_{A} (SI Appendix, Table S2), these results do not distinguish between their respective contributions to the patterns for ?_{S}. To pursue this question, it is necessary to generate predictions for both the BGS and SSW models. The relevant theory is described in Materials and Methods and SI Appendix, sections 1–6. In the next section, we investigate the effects of BGS alone on the relation between ?_{S} and ?_{na}, to examine the extent to which BGS could explain the observed relation between ?_{S} and K_{A}.